samofab Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 For 270 orientation fill_area doesn't work. I localized the problem to set_viewportline 95 in gdisp_lld.c: write_reg(0x44, (((x+cx-1) << 8) & 0xFF00 ) | (y & 0x00FF));should bewrite_reg(0x44, (((y+cy-1) << 8) & 0xFF00 ) | (y & 0x00FF)); Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Bodenmann Posted September 23, 2013 Report Share Posted September 23, 2013 Thank you very much for finding and reporting.I have currently lend my SSD1289 hardware to a friend - I'll digg into this within the following week.~ Tectu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Bodenmann Posted September 27, 2013 Report Share Posted September 27, 2013 I finally got my hardware back so I could test it out. You were right, there was a bug. It's fixed.Thank you very much for finding and reporting!~ Tectu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 in current trunk, gdisp lcd SSD1289.c semicolon is missing..line 243: dma_with_noinc(g, &c, g->p.cx*g->p.cy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Bodenmann Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 in current trunk, gdisp lcd SSD1289.c semicolon is missing..Fixed. Thank you very much, we appreciate these bug reports a lot.One of our major problems is that we can't test every possible case with the settings in the gfxconf.h as they are just too nested. ~ Tectu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 After initial problems, I have a working project for version 2.0 and testing the demo projects. My setup is stm32f4 discovery board, Open407V-D board and 3.2inch 320x240 Touch LCD with SSD1289 and ADS7843. I will report possible bugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Bodenmann Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Thank you very much for your support. From my own experience (mainly as a user), I agree that x.0 releases are always a bit tricky as there are some major restructurings happening It would be nice if you could contribute a boards/base directory for the Open407V-D to the community.~ Tectu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now